Choose one workflow
Do not blend research, contract review and litigation work into one average. Their inputs, risk and verification burden differ.
Build a transparent business case from your own workload. Count lawyer verification, adoption and software cost instead of presenting generation speed as guaranteed savings.
The model compares current workflow effort with a partially adopted AI-assisted process. It treats verification as real work, leaves non-adopted matters at their existing time and subtracts the software estimate from modeled capacity value.
Reclaimed hours = current effort − assisted work − lawyer verification − unchanged workNet value = reclaimed hours × defensible hourly value − software costCapacity value is not automatically cash saved or revenue earned. A law firm only realizes revenue when reclaimed time becomes additional collectible work. An in-house team may realize value through capacity, faster service or avoided external spend rather than payroll reduction.
Do not blend research, contract review and litigation work into one average. Their inputs, risk and verification burden differ.
Sample completed work before the pilot. Include intake, waiting, rework and quality control when those steps are within scope.
Verification time includes finding missed issues, repairing citations, reformatting and rebuilding unreliable output.
Not every matter is suitable, and not every lawyer will use the workflow immediately. Model the likely usable share.
Treat intake as one measurable workflow whether the current work is handled in-house, outsourced or through a hybrid service. Set the boundary from receipt of a request to an accepted handoff, then include the time spent clarifying submissions, checking conflicts and deadlines, reviewing documents, correcting routing and reopening incomplete matters.
Enter the monthly intake volume, current active handling time and realistic assisted time. Put quality control and exception review in lawyer verification, discount adoption for requests that cannot use the proposed process, and include recurring platform or service fees in software cost. Compare capacity, turnaround, rework and avoided external spend separately; they are not interchangeable forms of realised value.
The legal intake triage workflow defines a general routing model. For disputes and claims, use the legal case intake checklist to define the fields, decisions and acceptance standard before entering assumptions here.
The calculator opens with 100 work items a month, 75 current minutes per item, 25 assisted working minutes, 15 verification minutes, 70 percent adoption, ₹5,000 of capacity value per hour and ₹1,50,000 of monthly software cost. Those are editable sample inputs, not Gotham benchmarks.
Current effort = 100 × 75 ÷ 60 = 125 hoursModeled effort = (70 × 40 ÷ 60) + (30 × 75 ÷ 60) = 84.2 hoursReclaimed capacity = 125 − 84.2 = 40.8 hoursMonthly net value = (40.8 × ₹5,000) − ₹1,50,000 = approximately ₹54,167The example is intentionally less optimistic than subtracting AI time from every item. It leaves 30 non-adopted items unchanged and counts lawyer verification on the 70 adopted items. If assisted work plus verification exceeds the current baseline, the model reports no reclaimed time.
For each pilot item, record the workflow type, baseline source, current active minutes, assisted minutes, verification and correction minutes, accepted or rejected outcome, material error, reviewer and completion date. Summarise medians and ranges as well as averages so a few easy matters do not hide difficult cases.
Use Gotham's 40-criterion legal AI scorecard alongside the financial model. A workflow with attractive capacity economics still needs to pass accuracy, confidentiality, governance and implementation gates.