01
Choose the workflow
Name one recurring task, its inputs, reviewer and finished work product. No confidential documents are required for the first session.
30 minutes · one workflow · private working session
Find the first legal AI workflow
worth testing.
Bring one recurring task—not confidential matter files. We will map the work, identify the defensible automation boundary and decide whether a structured pilot is justified.
Request an assessment →§ 01 · Session structure
Make the workflow visible
before buying software.
02
Map the real process
Separate active lawyer work, waiting, handoffs, correction, source checks and approval instead of treating the task as one time estimate.
03
Find the safe boundary
Identify what can be assisted, what must stay with a qualified reviewer, and which data or integration constraints shape the design.
04
Decide the next test
Leave with a bounded pilot hypothesis, baseline measures and a candid recommendation to test, defer or stop.
§ 02 · Best fit
Useful when the team knows the pain,
but not the first deployment.
The session is designed for a partner, general counsel, legal operations owner or practitioner evaluating a recurring workflow. It is not legal advice, a security assessment or a substitute for procurement diligence.
- Contract review queues and playbooks
- Indian legal research and memo preparation
- Litigation chronologies and document review
- Due-diligence extraction and issues lists
- Regulatory monitoring and obligation workflows
Model the workflow economics first or use the evaluation scorecard if your shortlist already exists.
§ 01 · Workflow assessment
Tell us what you want to map.
Or skip the form and email counsel@trygotham.io directly. Same inbox; same response time.